Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-I...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rajasthan Financial Corporation Ltd., Udyog Bhawan, Tilakmarg, Jaipur

High Court 30 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rajasthan Financial Corporation Ltd., Udyog Bhawan, Tilakmarg, Jaipur
Date of order
30 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rajasthan Financial Corporation Ltd., Udyog Bhawan, Tilakmarg, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.Leaving the question of law open, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable in view of circular dated 15.03.2024.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.42/2021 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus M/s Rajasthan Financial Corporation Ltd., Udyog Bhawan, TilakMarg, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Sandeep Pathak, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr.P.K Kasliwal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAROrder 30/07/2024 1.This appeal is filed by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Jaipur against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal JaipurBench, Jaipur (for short ‘the Appellate Tribunal’). 2.The brief facts are that addition of Rs.3,00,000/- was madein the assessment year 2011-2012 by passing an order underSection 143(3) & 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘for shortthe Act’). The Commissioner of Income Tax dismissed the appealbut the respondent succeeded before the Appellate Tribunal.Hence, the present appeal. 3.Learned counsel for the respondent relies upon the Circulardated 15.03.2024 to submit that present appeal is notmaintainable as tax effect is Rs.1,01,700/-. 4.Learned counsel for the appellant at this stage is not able tomake out falling in exception carved out in circular dated15.03.2024. 5.Leaving the question of law open, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable in view of circular dated 15.03.2024. 6.The appellant shall be at liberty to move an application forrevival in case cause of action still survives. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR), J(AVNEESH JHINGAN), J HS/TANISHA/16
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan