Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Amit Agarwal, 101, Near Pondrik Park, Brahampuri, Jaipur
High Court
30 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Amit Agarwal, 101, Near Pondrik Park, Brahampuri, Jaipur
Date of order
30 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Amit Agarwal, 101, Near Pondrik Park, Brahampuri, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 14/2022
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Amit Agarwal, 101, Near Pondrik Park, Brahampuri, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : NoneFor Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
30/09/2024
1.None present on behalf of the appellant in spite of two pass
overs.
2.The tax effect in appeal is below Rupees Two Crores, in viewof the circular of Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024,learned counsel for appellant seeks permission to withdraw theappeal.
3.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4.The formulated substantial question of law is kept open.
5.The appellant-Department shall be at liberty to move an
application for revival in case the matter is not covered under the
circular.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
HS/Tanisha/88
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue