Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur - Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Ahinsacircle, Jaipur
High Court
21 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur - Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Ahinsacircle, Jaipur
Date of order
21 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur - Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Ahinsacircle, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.The appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 254/2018
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur - Ii, Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, AhinsaCircle, Jaipur
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 257/2018
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, AhinsaCircle, Jaipur.
----Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 258/2018Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur Ii, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Laxmi Narain Agarwal, 104, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, AhinsaCircle, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Arnav Singh for Mr. R.B. MathurFor Respondent(s): Mr. Javed Khan through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAROrder
21/08/2024
1.These appeals are filed against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Jaipur dated 23.03.2018. The tax quantum
involved in these appeals is Rs.17,96,495/-, Rs.14,11,408/- andRs.92,85,399/- respectively.
2.The appeals do not fall within the exception carved out in thecircular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated15.03.2024. There is no opinion of the Board that it is necessaryto contest the matters in the interest of justice or revenue. Thecircular dated 15.03.2024 is in supersession to all earlier circulars.
3.It is clarified that the appeals are dismissed on account ofmonetary limit and the substantial question of law is kept open.
4.The appeals are dismissed.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat/231-233
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.