Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Vivek Gupta
High Court
08 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Vivek Gupta
Date of order
08 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Shri Vivek Gupta, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR.
DB INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.205/2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Jaipur-II, Jaipur.
Versus
Shri Vivek Gupta, 30, Kamal Gatta Colony, Opp. Niwas Garden,Janta Market, Jaipur.
DATE OF ORDER ::: 08.11.2016.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Mr. R.B. Mathur, for the appellant.
1.By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged theorder of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has confirmed theorder passed by the CIT Appeal.
2.Counsel for the appellant has contended that both theauthorities i.e. CIT (Appeals) and Tribunal have committed errorin deleting Rs.10615290/- and have also committed an error in
reversing the well reasoned judgment given by the AO.
3.Heard Mr. Mathur, counsel for the appellant.
4.In view of the detailed reasoning adopted by the CIT(Appeals) in para 5.1 considering the payment made throughdemand draft for purchase and consideration.
6.In view of the concurrent finding of fact, no substantialquestion of law arises and appeal being devoid of merit standsdismissed.
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR), J. (K.S. JHAVERI), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.