Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu v....

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu v. M/S Jyoti Ltd

High Court 25 Sep 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · kashmirhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu v. M/S Jyoti Ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Jammu v. M/S Jyoti Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Para 2 of the Circular is reproduced as under:- As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-Tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows: In view of aforesaid facts and circums...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKHAT SRINAGAR ITA No. 2/2017 C/w ITA No. 3/2017, ITA No. 4/2017, ITA No. 5/2017, ITA No. 6/2017, ITA No. 7/2017, ITA No. 8/2017 & ITA No. 9/2017 …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Jammu Through: Mr. Umar Rashid Wani, Advocate Vs. M/s Jyoti Ltd. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Amin Bhat, Advocate Mr. Muzamil Yousuf, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE O R D E R 25.09.2025 Mr. Umar Rashid Wani, learned counsel for appellant submits that the tax effect in these appeals is less than 2 Crores, thus, in terms of para 2 of the Circular dated 17[th] September 2024, the Respondent-Income Department wants to withdraw these appeals. Para 2 of the Circular is reproduced as under:- As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-Tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows: In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, all the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan