Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v....

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. M/S. Patel Agarwal Company, Through

High Court 14 May 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

14 May 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota v. M/S. Patel Agarwal Company, Through, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoraton Application No. 681/2017 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus M/s. Patel Agarwal Company, Through Partner Sh. SubhashAgarwal, 185, Shopping Centre, Kota. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Parinitoo Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS Order 14/05/2018 As per office report, restoration application is within time butcounsel for the applicant has filed an application u/s 5 of theLimitation Act. The application (2488/2017) stands disposed of. Defects waived. Application (37956/2017) stands disposedof. For the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, thesame is allowed. The order dt. 25.10.2017 is recalled. The appeal is restored to its original number and be listed today itself. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J(K.S.JHAVERI),J Brijesh 11.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.