Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkul...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Appe

High Court 25 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

25 May 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. Appe, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.411 of 2015Date of decision: 25.5.2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula Vs. .-..-- Appe Housing Board Haryana, Panchkula ...espondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant-revenue. Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rinku Dahiya,Advocate and Ms. Rajni Pal, Advocate for the respondent-assessee. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.420 of 2015 (Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula vs. Housing Board, Haryana, Panchkula) (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge May 25, 2016 (Raj Rahul Garg) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.