Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur-1,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur-1, Raipur, C.g v. Prinyanka Jain, 59 Old Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Durg, (Chhattisgarh)

High Court 17 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur-1, Raipur, C.g v. Prinyanka Jain, 59 Old Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Durg, (Chhattisgarh)
Date of order
17 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur-1, Raipur, C.g v. Prinyanka Jain, 59 Old Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Durg, (Chhattisgarh), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Page No.1 of 3IN--TAXC322025 2025:CGHC:50812-DB NAFR DigitallySAIFANsigned byKHANSAIFANKHANHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 32 of 2025 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur-1, Raipur, C.G. ... Appellant Versus Prinyanka Jain, 59 Old Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Durg, (Chhattisgarh)- 490020 PAN- JBPP05226E. ... Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, AdvocateFor Respondent:Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalOrder on Board(13.10.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1.When the case is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which, monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the Department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 crores whereas, in the present case, the tax liability of the assessee is less than Rs.2 Crores. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid circular dated 17.09.2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally. 2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of the circular dated 17.09.2024 are quoted below:- “1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) dated15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax Appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/Appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular. 2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of Appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.NAppeals/SLPsin Monetary Limit (Tax o.income-tax matterseffect in Rs.)1.Before Income Tax 60 lacsAppellalte Tribunal o.income-tax matterseffect in Rs.)1.Before Income Tax 60 lacsAppellalte Tribunal 2.Before High Court2 crores3.Before Supreme Court 5 crores3.Before Supreme Court 5 crores 3. Monetary limits given in paragraph-2 above with regard to filing Appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-Tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to Appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits. 4. It is clarified that an Appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of Appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. s@if The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an Appeal. 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/Appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ Appeals pending before Supreme Courts/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow.” 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the s@if The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an Appeal. 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/Appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ Appeals pending before Supreme Courts/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow.” 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores and in the light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17.09.2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of. Sd/- sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan