Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Ch...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh v. Priyanka Jain

High Court 25 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

25 Jun 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh v. Priyanka Jain, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byAJAY KUMARDWIVEDIDate:2025.06.2712:01:49+0530 2025:CGHC:27937-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 600 of 2025 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant. versus Priyanka Jain 59, Old Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Durg Chhattisgarh - 490020, Pan - Jbppo5226e ... Respondent. For Applicant : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate.Chaudhari, Advocate. For Respondent :None. Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal &Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ Order on Board (26/06/2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAX Case No.32/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance of this Court's peremptory order dated 02.04.2025. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of TAX Case No.32/2025, which was dismissed for non-compliance of this Court's peremptory order dated 02.04.2025. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. TAX For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. TAX Case No.32/2025 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 3.allowed. Accordingly, the MCC is Accordingly, the MCC is Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Judge Ajay

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.