Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur, District Raipur (Cg v. Nandika Consultancy Services P. Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur, District Raipur (Cg v. Nandika Consultancy Services P. Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur, District Raipur (Cg v. Nandika Consultancy Services P. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
TAXC No. 28 of 2022
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Raipur, District Raipur (CG)
---- Appellant
Versus
Nandika Consultancy Services P. Ltd., C/o Basant Kumar Jain, D-13/14, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)
---- Respondent
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
___________________________________________________________
For Appellant: Mr. Amit Chaudhari, AdvocateFor Respondent :None
Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief JusticeHon'ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge
Order on Board
Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
21.02.2023
Though the appeal was filed under Section 260 A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961, Mr. Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel for the appellantsubmits that he is not pressing this appeal as the value of the appeal isless than Rs.1,00,00,000.00, which is the minimum amount required forpreferring an appeal in terms of Circular No. 17/2019, issued by MemoNo.F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.), Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, JudicialSection, dated 08.08.2019.
2. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Arup Kumar Goswami)(Sachin Singh Rajput) Chief Justice Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.