Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot - 1 v. Manishaben N Mashru
High Court
10 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot - 1 v. Manishaben N Mashru
Date of order
10 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot - 1 v. Manishaben N Mashru, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These Tax Appeals relating to the penalty are, therefore, also dismissed only on this ground.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 1100 of 2018
With
R/TAX APPEAL No. 1102 of 2018
=============================================================
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT - 1Versus
MANISHABEN N MASHRU
=============================================================
Appearance :Mrs. MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
=============================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandand
HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA10[th] September 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
These Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue involve the same assessee and identical question for deletion of penalty levied by the Assessing Officer under Section 271 [1](c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The CIT [A] and the Tribunal having deleted the quantum additions, the penalty was also deleted. The Tribunal also pressed an additional ground in service, namely, that the additions were made on estimation basis and the penalty therefore cannot be sustained.
By a separate order passed today, we have confirmed such deletion of quantum additions and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals. These Tax Appeals relating to the penalty are, therefore, also dismissed only on this ground.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.