Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot 1 v. M/S Jyoti Cnc Automation Pvt Ltd ============================================= Appearance
High Court
27 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot 1 v. M/S Jyoti Cnc Automation Pvt Ltd ============================================= Appearance
Date of order
27 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot 1 v. M/S Jyoti Cnc Automation Pvt Ltd ============================================= Appearance, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, present appeal is dismissed. sd/-(M.R.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/669/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 669 of 2018
=========================================
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT 1Versus
M/S JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION PVT LTD=============================================Appearance:
MR. M.R. BHATT, ADVOCATE WITH MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 27/06/2018ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28.11.2017 in CO No.48/RJT/2015 for AY 2009-10, the Revenue has preferred present Appeal.
Having heard Shri Bhatt, learned counsel for the appellant and considering the impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal, it appears that present appeal is wrongly filed by the Revenue has as such before the learned Tribunal assessee has not pressed the cross objection. Under the circumstances, when the learned Tribunal has dismissed the cross objection as not pressed, there is no question of preferring any appeal as no adverse order has been passed against the appellant. Hence, present appeal is dismissed.
sd/-(M.R. SHAH, J)
KAUSHIK J. RATHOD
sd/-(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.