Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot 1 v. Venkateshwara Transports ==========================================================
High Court
23 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot 1 v. Venkateshwara Transports ==========================================================
Date of order
23 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Rajkot 1 v. Venkateshwara Transports ==========================================================, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 283 of 2018
==========================================================PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RAJKOT 1 VersusVENKATESHWARA TRANSPORTS ==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 23/07/2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
This Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is at the instance of the Revenue and is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot, in the ITA No.506/Rajkot/2015 for the A.Y.2010-2011 dated 14/07/2017.
2.Vide order dated 4.4.2018, this Court admitted the Tax Appeal on the following question of law :
"Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law an don facts in deleting the addition made by the AO after rejecting the books under section 145 of hte Act and thereby estimating the profit @ 8%?
3.It is not disputed by the Revenue that having regard to the low tax effect, this Tax Appeal need not be adjudicated on merits.
4.In such circumstances, the Tax Appeal No. 283/2018, is disposed of on the ground of low tax effect. However, we clarify that the Tax Appeal No. 2619/2010, which was ordered to be heard with the present Tax Appeal, shall be heard independently.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
MARY VADAKKAN
(A. C. RAO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.