Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. H.p. Industrial Development Corporation
High Court
24 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. H.p. Industrial Development Corporation
Date of order
24 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. H.p. Industrial Development Corporation, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant : Mr.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.14 of 2015
Date of Decision: 24[th] October, 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla.
.......Appellant.
Versus
……Respondent.
H.P. Industrial Development Corporation.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the appellant : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Devi
Singh Verma, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (oral).
Order dated 27.9.2010, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Shimla, H.P; in Appeal No.IT/318/09-10-SML, filed by M/s H.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd; Shimla (Annexure P-2), affirmed vide order dated 8.10.2014 by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh Bench ‘A’, Chandigarh, in ITA No.1226, 1227/Chd/2010, titled as H.P. State Industrial Development Corporation, Shimla vs. A.C.I.T Circle, Shimla (Annexure PA), is the subject matter of consideration in the present appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. In view of para-5 of Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.7.2018, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, appeal is not pressed due to low tax component involved in the appeal. Ordered accordingly.
3.
However, it stands clarified that withdrawal of the appeal
shall not have any bearing on the outcome/merits of other connected
matters, if any.
(Sanjay Karol)
Judge
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
24[th] October, 2018 Judge
(CS)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.