Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech

High Court 10 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech
Date of order
10 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Associated Biotech, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2The instant appeal stands disposed of in aboveterms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA ITA No. 96 of 2018 Decided on: 10.05.2019 _______________________________________________________________ Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla ….. Appellant Versus M/s Associated Biotech ……Respondent _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.1Whether approved for reporting? _______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)OMP No. 153 of 2019 Issue notice. Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, learned vicecounsel accepts service of notice on behalf of theappellant/non-applicant. 2Heard. The prayer in this application is to recallthe order dated 30[th] October, 2018, vide which ITA No. 96 of2018 filed by the Revenue was allowed ex-parte. 3It is averred that since the partners of theassessee could not meet, they could not engage a Counselto represent them before this Court and as such noassistance could be rendered on their behalf at the time ofadjudication of the appeal. It is a matter of record that the respondent-assessee was unrepresented and the appeal was allowed ex-parte. 4For the reason mentioned in the application, thesame is allowed and the order dated 30[th] October, 2018 isrecalled. ITA No. 96 of 2018 is restored to its original numberand file. The application is disposed of. ITA No. 96 of 2018 1 It could not be seriously disputed on behalf of the appellant-Revenue that the instant appeal is liable to bedismissed being covered by a decision of Hon’ble SupremeCourt, rendered in Civil Appeal(s) No 1784 of 2019, titledas Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla vs. M/sAarham Softronics and other connected matters, decidedon 20[th] February, 2019. Ordered accordingly. 2The instant appeal stands disposed of in aboveterms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge May 10, 2018(raman/rohit) (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan