Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Devon Hotels
High Court
10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Devon Hotels
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Devon Hotels, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.17 of 2016
Date of decision:10.10.2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla.
…. Appellant.
Versus
M/s Devon Hotels
…. Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.
For the Appellant : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
For the Respondent :Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (Oral)
Order dated 29.12.2014, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Shimla, H.P., in Appeal No.IT/426, 429 & 428/13-14/Sml, filed by M/s Deven Hotels (Annexure P-2), affirmed vide order dated 6.11.2015 by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, in ITA No. 294/Chd/2015, titled as The ITO Nahan vs. M/s Devon Hotels (Annexure PA), is the subject matter of Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
consideration in the present appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. In view of para-5 of Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.7.2018, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, appeal is not pressed due to low tax component involved in the appeal. Ordered accordingly.
2. However, it stands clarified that withdrawal of the appeal shall not have any bearing on the outcome/merits of other connected matters, if any.
(Sanjay Karol),
Judge.
October 10, 2018 (KS)
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.