Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Sigma Print
High Court
04 Apr 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Sigma Print
Date of order
04 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla v. M/S Sigma Print, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting[1]? _____________________________________________________________ For the appellant Mr.
Decision: The instant appeal stands disposed of in above terms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ITA No. 95 of 2018 Decided on: 4.4.2019
_____________________________________________________________
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla ....Appellant Versus M/s Sigma Print ...Respondent
_____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting[1]?
_____________________________________________________________
For the appellant Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan and Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocates.
_____________________________________________________________
Surya Kant, Chief Justice (Oral)
It could not be seriously disputed on behalf of the appellant-Revenue that the instant appeal is liable to be dismissed being covered by a decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court, rendered in Civil Appeal No(s) 1784 of 2019, titled as
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Shimla vs. M/s Aarham Softronics and other connected matters, decided on 20[th]February, 2019. Ordered accordingly.
2. The instant appeal stands disposed of in above terms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Surya Kant) Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue