Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur,...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur, Udaipur v. M/S Rajtech Construction Pvt. Ltd., Kaka Saheb Dargah Road,Pratapgarh

High Court 13 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur, Udaipur v. M/S Rajtech Construction Pvt. Ltd., Kaka Saheb Dargah Road,Pratapgarh
Date of order
13 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur, Udaipur v. M/S Rajtech Construction Pvt. Ltd., Kaka Saheb Dargah Road,Pratapgarh, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Application No. 13/2019 IN D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.91/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur, Udaipur ----applicant Versus M/s Rajtech Construction Pvt. Ltd., Kaka Saheb Dargah Road,Pratapgarh. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN Order 13/05/2024 In view of Circular No.17/2019 (F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.) dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the appeal being lessthan Rs. 1 crore, learned counsel appearing for the applicantseeks permission to withdraw the application. The permission is granted. The misc. application is dismissed as withdrawn. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 22-nirmala/- (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan