Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Ankit Chirag Developers Pvt. Ltd., 54-55, Rajdeep, Newfatehpura, Udaipur

High Court 13 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

13 Aug 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Ankit Chirag Developers Pvt. Ltd., 54-55, Rajdeep, Newfatehpura, Udaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 8/2024 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Ankit Chirag Developers Pvt. Ltd., 54-55, Rajdeep, NewFatehpura, Udaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s): Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): -- HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order 13/08/2024 Learned counsel for the Revenue Department would submitthat another income tax appeal being D.B. Income Tax AppealNo.4/2022 filed by the Revenue Department against the sameassessee involving identical issue for the same assessment yearhas been dismissed by this Court on 14.12.2023. In view of the above statement, this appeal is alsodismissed. (MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ 15-pooja/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.