Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Bhim Singh Chundawat & Party, 106, Vallabh Bari, Kota(Rajasthan
High Court
20 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Bhim Singh Chundawat & Party, 106, Vallabh Bari, Kota(Rajasthan
Date of order
20 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Bhim Singh Chundawat & Party, 106, Vallabh Bari, Kota(Rajasthan, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 57 / 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Bhim Singh Chundawat & Party, 106, Vallabh Bari, Kota(Rajasthan).
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUROrder
20/03/2017
Having considered the order passed by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeal), that came to be affirmed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal under the order dated 08.03.2016, we do notfind any just reason to interfere with the order impugned.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in quite unambiguousterm, after recording all facts of the case, arrived at theconclusion that the Revenue has failed to dislodge the basis onwhich the commissioner deleted the addition made by theAssessing Officer.
In entirety, the appeal does not involve any error thatwarrant any interference with the impugned order. The appealstands dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.