Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Hari Om Marmo Grani Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

11 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/S Hari Om Marmo Grani Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR D.B. Civil Restoration No. 3/2020 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus M/s Hari Om Marmo Grani Pvt. Ltd. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Chouhan on behalf ofMr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent(s): - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI 11/04/2022 Order In view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of FinanceDepartment of Revenue, Central board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present appealbeing less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission to withdraw the restorationapplication. Permission is granted. The instant restoration application is dismissed as withdrawn. (FARJAND ALI),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.