Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Akash Jain
High Court
27 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Akash Jain
Date of order
27 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur v. Shri Akash Jain, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 107/2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Akash Jain, 169, O-Road, Bhopalpura, Udaipur.
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 98/2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Akash Jain, 169, O-Road, Bhopalpura, Udaipur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
: Mr. K.K. Bissa with Mr. G.S. Chouhan and Mr. H.G. Chanda.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
27/08/2019
Order
In view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.No.279/MISC./142/2007-ITJ (PT.)] dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes,Government of India, New Delhi, as clarified vide communicationdated 20.08.2019, the tax effect involved in the present appealbeing less than Rs.1 crore, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeals.
Permission is granted.
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
194 & 195-DJ/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.