Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Udaipur...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Udaipur v. Shri Satramdas Mehta, J

High Court 24 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax- Udaipur v. Shri Satramdas Mehta, J, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR D.B. Civil Review Petition No. 12/2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- Udaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Shri Satramdas Mehta, J-21, Shakti Nagar, Udaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR 24/07/2019 Order This review petition has been filed by the review-petitionerseeking review of order dated 03.03.2016 passed by a CoordinateBench of this Court in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.15/2004. Learned counsel for the review-petitioner/appellant submitsthat in view of Circular No.3/18 dated 11.7.18 issued by theMinistry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board DirectTaxes, Government of India, New Delhi, the tax effect involved inthe present appeal being less than Rs.50 lacs, the review-petitioner/appellant seeks permission to withdraw the reviewpetition. Permission granted. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 1-DJ/- (SANGEET LODHA),J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.