In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi, New Delhi v. M/S Maruti Suzuki India Limited, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question raised by the Revenue in this appeal, viz., whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can extend an interim order beyond the statutorily permissible limit of 365 days has been answered in the affirmative by this Court in Pepsi Food Pvt.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 486/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, NEW DELHI
..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Arun Khatri, Adv.
versus
M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED
..... Respondent
Through : Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advs.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R07.07.2017
1. The question raised by the Revenue in this appeal, viz., whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can extend an interim order beyond the statutorily permissible limit of 365 days has been answered in the affirmative by this Court in Pepsi Food Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2015) 376 ITR 87 (Del).
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JULY 07, 2017/dk
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue