Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Avaya...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 05 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
05 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 27. + ITA 235/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Advocate. versus AVAYA INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 05.04.2016 CM No. 12612/2016 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. ITA No. 235/2016 2. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) is against an order dated 18[th] September 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 5528/Del/2011 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2007-08. 3. The principal question that is sought to be urged by the Revenue in the present appeal is whether ITAT was justified in remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) for undertaking a risk adjustment for the purposes ITA No. 235 of 2016 ’of the comparability analysis by the Department for determining the arms length price (‘ALP’) of the international transaction entered into by the Assessee and its Associate Enterprise. The ITAT has in doing so relied upon the order dated 14[th] August 2014 passed by it in the case of Motorola Solutions India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (ITA No.5637/Del/2011). Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue,the Court finds no legal infirmity in the above decision of the ITAT that gives rise to any substantial question of law. 4. Even as regards the other issues urged, the Court is not persuaded to frame a question. 5. The appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J APRIL 05, 2016 dn VIBHU BAKHRU, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan