Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Imran...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Imran Farooq Sheikh

High Court 07 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · kashmirhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Imran Farooq Sheikh
Date of order
07 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Imran Farooq Sheikh, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of above, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR ITA No. 01/2018 Date of order:- 07.03.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Imran Farooq Sheikh Coram: Hon’ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge Hon’ble Mr Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. A. Kawoosa, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Altaf Haqani, Advocate Learned appearing counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal in terms of communication dated 30.01.2019, which indicates that the Tax effect in respect of Sh. Imran Farooq Sheikh for the assessment year 2011-12 is Rs. 30,96,777/- which is below Rs. 50.00 lacs, therefore, is covered under CBTD Instruction No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. Communication is taken on record. In view of above, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge (Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge Srinagar 07.03.2019 Mohammad Yasin Dar
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan