Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manish...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manisha Gupta

High Court 26 Sep 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

26 Sep 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Manisha Gupta, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 555/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Sr.Standing counsel versus MANISHA GUPTA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R% 26.09.2016 ITA 555/2016 & C.M.No.27839/2016 (Delay) The present appeal is hopelessly time-barred by 1020 days. Besides, we also notice that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has affirmed the concurrent finding of fact by CIT (A) and the ITAT. The appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay. The pending applications also stand disposed of. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 mr DEEPA SHARMA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.