Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Him Technoforge Ltd
High Court
12 Oct 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Him Technoforge Ltd
Date of order
12 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Him Technoforge Ltd, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether approved for reporting?[1] For the appellant: Mr.
Decision: 11 of 2019 2.In view of the order passed in the application(supra), the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also thepending miscellaneous applications, if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No. 11 of 2019
Decided on: 12.10.2020
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
…Appellant
Versus
M/s. Him Technoforge Ltd.
…Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?[1]
For the appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate,with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
For the respondent:Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
(Through Video Conferencing)
L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.(Oral)
OMP No. 312 of 2020
The appellant-applicant has moved this
application seeking permission to withdraw the main appeal in
view of CBDT's Circular No. 17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019.
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
The application is allowed and the appellant-applicant ispermitted to withdraw the appeal. The application is disposedof accordingly.
ITA No. 11 of 2019
2.In view of the order passed in the application(supra), the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also thepending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice
October 12, 2020 ( rajni )
(Anoop Chitkara) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue