Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S H.p. Powercorporation Ltd
High Court
16 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S H.p. Powercorporation Ltd
Date of order
16 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S H.p. Powercorporation Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
16.11.2022
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s H.P. PowerCorporation Ltd.
ITA No. of 2022
Present:Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate for therespondent.
OMP(M) No. 30 of 2020.
Heard. Application has not been opposed and is
accordingly allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
Appeal be registered.
ITA No. of 2022.
Heard.
Admitted on the following substantial questions
of law:-
(i)Whether the Hon’ble ITAT is right in law and on thefacts and the circumstances of the case in holdingthat the interest income earned by the assessee onsurplus funds out of borrowed funds amounting toRs.14,54,38,870/- could not be treated as “incomefrom other sources” and is thus, not liable to betaxed?facts and the circumstances of the case in holdingthat the interest income earned by the assessee onsurplus funds out of borrowed funds amounting toRs.14,54,38,870/- could not be treated as “incomefrom other sources” and is thus, not liable to betaxed?
(ii)Whether the judgment of the Hon’ble ITAT isperverse as it is based on a misreading andmisinterpretation of the facts and law laid down bythe Hon’ble Supreme Court?perverse as it is based on a misreading andmisinterpretation of the facts and law laid down bythe Hon’ble Supreme Court?
List withITA No.38 of 2015.
(Sabina) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja)Judge
November 16, 2022 (ps)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.