Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Prakash Power Ventures Ltd
High Court
25 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Prakash Power Ventures Ltd
Date of order
25 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Prakash Power Ventures Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: As such, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of law laid down by the Apex court in National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd(supra).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
ITA No.75 of 2017
Date of decision: 25.04.2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant
Versus
M/s Jai Prakash Power Ventures Ltd . Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant: Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate.
For the respondent:
Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
________________________________________________________________________________
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Undisputedly, issues involved in the present appeal
already stand adjudicated by the Apex Court in National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2010) 320 ITR 374 (SC). 2. As such, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of law laid down by the Apex court in National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd(supra).
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
April 25, 2018
(vt)
( Sandeep Sharma ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue