Case Law › High Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ki...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kinko Computer Industries

High Court 11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cmis

Parties

Date of order

11 Nov 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kinko Computer Industries, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. ITA No. 100 of 2018. Decided on: 11[th] November, 2019. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax ……Petitioner. Versus M/s Kinko Computer Industries .…Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1] No. For the Petitioner:Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, SeniorAdvocate with Mr. Diwan Negi,Advocate.Advocate with Mr. Diwan Negi,Advocate. For the respondent:Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J (oral). In view of the circular No.17/2019,dated 8.8.2019, due to low tax effect i.e. less thanone crore, learned counsel seeks permission towithdraw the appeal. Permission granted. Theappeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice (Jyotsna Rewal Dua), Judge November 11, 2019(ps) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.