Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ruchira Packaging Products Pvt.ltd
High Court
08 Oct 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ruchira Packaging Products Pvt.ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ruchira Packaging Products Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ITA No. 7 of 2020
Decided on: 8[th] October, 2020
__________________________________________________________________
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax
......Petitioner
Versus
M/s Ruchira Packaging Products Pvt.Ltd.
…Respondent
__________________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
1Whether approved for reporting?
______________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Ms. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate Senior Advocate with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate.
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge(Oral)
OMP (M) No. 24 of 2020
The appeal has been filed within time, therefore, application for condonation of delay is misconceived and is dismissed accordingly.
Appeal be Registered.
ITA No. 7 of 2020
The main tax is of Rs.1,00,000/-, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere. However, as far as applicability of the Rules is concerned, the same shall be
1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- 2 -
considered in an appropriate case. The petition stands
disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
October 8, 2020 (Gaurav/R. Atal)
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.