Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Th...

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Jammu And Kashmir Bank Ltd

High Court 31 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jammuhc
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Jammu And Kashmir Bank Ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Jammu And Kashmir Bank Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: For the Respondent(s)pondent(s)ondent(s)(s)s)): For the Respondent(s)pondent(s)ondent(s)(s)s)): i/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Press/Media ii/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Digest/Journal APITA No.2/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, requirement of filing of certified copy o...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Regular list Item No. 15 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAT JAMMU APITA No.2/2017 c/w ITA No.7/2017 Date of order: 31.07.2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s The Jammu And Kashmir Bank Ltd. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge Appearing counsel: For the Appellant/petitioner(s) : Mrs. Aruna Thakur, Adv. For the Respondent(s)pondent(s)ondent(s)(s)s)): For the Respondent(s)pondent(s)ondent(s)(s)s)): i/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Press/Media ii/ Whether to be reported in : Yes/No Digest/Journal APITA No.2/2017 For the reasons stated in the application, requirement of filing of certified copy of the order of the ITAT, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar dated 17.12.2015 is dispensed with. Accordingly, APITA No.2/2017 is allowed. ( Sanjeev Kumar ) ( Alok Aradhe ) Judge Judge Jammu 31.07.2017Raj Kumar
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan