Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Khemka
High Court
28 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Khemka
Date of order
28 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shyam Sunder Khemka, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
3.
+ ITA 253/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Advocate.
versus
SHYAM SUNDER KHEMKA
..... Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 28.04.2017
-CM No. 12301/2017 (for condonation of delay of 14 days in refiling the appeal)
1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 14 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
2. The application is disposed of.
ITA No. 253/2017
3. One of the points urged in this appeal is that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) did not consider Section 80AC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’). It is seen that such a ground was not raised before the ITAT. Learned counsel for the Revenue states that an application has been filed before the ITAT for that purpose. ITA 253/2017 Page 1 of 2
4. Depending upon the outcome of the said application, it will be open to the Revenue to approach this Court again.
5. The appeal is dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
APRIL 28, 2017 dn
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
ITA 253/2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.