Case LawHigh Court › Pr. Commissionerof Incometax-(Central-2...

Pr. Commissionerof Incometax-(Central-2 v. Consultancyintegratedservicespvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Nov 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr. Commissionerof Incometax-(Central-2 v. Consultancyintegratedservicespvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr. Commissionerof Incometax-(Central-2 v. Consultancyintegratedservicespvt. Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Ltd.), these appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 17. +ITA 844/2015 PR. COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX-(CENTRAL-2) Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior StandingCounsel with Ms lakshmi Gurung, Junior StandingCounsel, Mr Radhika Gupta and Mr AbhishekSharma, Advocates^ versus CONSULTANCYINTEGRATEDSERVICESPVT. LTD ThroughAND ..... Respondent +ITA 845/2015 PR. COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX-(CENTRAL-2) Appellant Through: Ms Suruchi Aggarwal, Senior StandingCounsel with Ms lakshmi Gurung, Junior StandingCounsel, Mr Radhika Gupta and Mr AbhishekSharma, Advocates. versus CONSULTANCY INTEGRATEDSERVICESPVT. LTD Through Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER%06.11.2015 CM No.26198/2015in ITA 844/2015CM No.26199/2015in ITA 845/2015 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The applications stand disposed of. ITA Nos.844/2015& 845/2015 3. In view of the decision dated 24^*^ July, 2015 of this Court in ITANo.424/2015 {Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-Ill)v. AakashArogya Mandir P. Ltd.), these appeals are dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 06,2015 MK VIBHUBAKHRU,J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan