Case Law › High Court › Prabhakar Bhaiyaji Ghode v. Commissioner...

Prabhakar Bhaiyaji Ghode v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Vidarbha) Nagpur

High Court 23 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

23 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Prabhakar Bhaiyaji Ghode v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Vidarbha) Nagpur, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: If, paper book is not filed within four weeks, the reference shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPURIncome Tax Reference No. 9/2008 Prabhakar Bhaiyaji Ghode ..vs.. Commissioner of Income Tax (Vidarbha) Nagpur. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's Orders orCourt's or Judge's Ordersdirections and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. S. Bhattad, Advocate for applicant. CORAM: S. A. BOBDE & F. M. REIS,JJ.DATED : 23rd APRIL, 2009 Mr. Bhattad, Advocate undertakes to file paper book within four weeks. If, paper book is not filed within four weeks, the reference shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. JUDGE JUDGE kahale

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.