In Prafulla Velingkar v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Panaji And Anr, the High Court decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2022IN
WRIT PETITION NO.490 OF 2022
... APPLICANT
PRAFULLA VELINGKAR
VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1) PANAJI AND ANR
... RESPONDENTS
REGISTRAR'S ORDER
None present for the parties. Since the parties have not appearedto extract the representation prepared by this Office. It is presumed thatthe parties have accepted the draft calculations, and hence, the amount tobe disbursed as per the calculations prepared by the Registry dated.25.11.2024.
Dated: 27th November, 2024
Rp*
( Sudhir S. Shirgaonkar ) (Registrar Judicial)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue