In Prahallad Moharana v. Mr. B. Panda, Advocate, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.320 of 2017
Prahallad Moharana
….
Petitioner
-versus-
Mr. B. Panda, Advocate
Assistant Director of Income Tax (Inv.) and others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.04.
ORDER13.02.2024
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel on behalf of the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition as the matter has become infructuous. A memo filed to that effect be kept on record.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
(Arindam Sinha)
Signature Not Verified
Judge
Digitally SignedSigned by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOLJyoti/RKSDesignation: Junior StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: HIGH COURT OF ORISSADate: 15-Feb-2024 11:09:39
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.