Prakairat Ahuja & Anr v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tds -2 & Ors

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6787/2023 PRAKAIRAT AHUJA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pinaki Addy, Adv with Ms. Neetu Singh and Ms. Niraj Kumari, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS -2 & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agarwal, Sr. SC. % CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R12.02.2024 1.Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, apprises us that the discrepancy in the record which had crept in on the account of the seller having wrongly mentioned the Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number ["TAN"] instead of the Permanent Account Number ["PAN"] has been resolved. 2.In view of the aforesaid, we close the instant writ petition. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner has however, referred to certain applications which have been made by the original vendor and are pending consideration. Since those aspects are neither part of nor subject matter of the instant writ petition, we do not propose to render any observation except to state that it shall be open to the said individual to pursue any application made in accordance with law. YASHWANT VARMA, J. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. FEBRUARY 12, 2024/MJ