Prakash Chand Sharma Son Of Shri Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Agedabout 60 Years, Resident Of C-42 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
High Court
26 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Prakash Chand Sharma Son Of Shri Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Agedabout 60 Years, Resident Of C-42 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
26 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Prakash Chand Sharma Son Of Shri Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Agedabout 60 Years, Resident Of C-42 v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 863/2025
Prakash Chand Sharma Son Of Shri Vishnu Dutt Sharma, AgedAbout 60 Years, Resident Of C-42-43, Kaladeep, Gokul Path,Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur 302021
----Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1, Jaipur Having ItsOffice At New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, BhagwanDas Road, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Rohan Chatter For Respondent(s): Mr. Sandeep Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
26/09/2025
Judgment / Order
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw thiscivil writ petition.
The civil writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Pendingapplication(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/113
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue