Prakash v. Income Tax Office
High Court
01 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Prakash v. Income Tax Office
Date of order
01 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Prakash v. Income Tax Office, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of that, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.10 OF 2003
Prakash S/o Vasudeo Khatri died through his heirs Usha Wd/o Prakash Khatri and others Vs. Income Tax Office.
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's ordersMemoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions andRegistrar's orders.Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions andRegistrar's orders.
Mr.Alok Sharma, advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
K.K.SONAWANE,JJ.
Date : 01.04.2016.
PER COURT :
1.The appellant is served through Court notice. On 7.2.2012, the appeal was dismissed for default. The same was restored on 10.4.2015, at the request of the appellant.
2.Today when the matter is called out, none appears for the appellant. In view of that, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(K.K.SONAWANE,J.)(S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.01.04.2016. asp/office/Incometaxa10.03
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue