Prakashbhai Dhansukhbhai Vashi L/H Of Late Dhasukhbhaibhikhabhai Vashi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3)(1
High Court
12 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Prakashbhai Dhansukhbhai Vashi L/H Of Late Dhasukhbhaibhikhabhai Vashi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3)(1
Date of order
12 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Prakashbhai Dhansukhbhai Vashi L/H Of Late Dhasukhbhaibhikhabhai Vashi v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3)(1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4888 of 2022
=============================================PRAKASHBHAI DHANSUKHBHAI VASHI L/H OF LATE DHASUKHBHAIBHIKHABHAI VASHI
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1)
=============================================
Appearance:
MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 12/04/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.By this writ application under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, the writ applicant seeks to question thelegality and validity of the impugned notice issued by therespondents under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act, 1961’) dated 18.11.2021, seeking to reopenthe assessment for the A.Y. 2013-14.
2.We have heard Mr. Manish J. Shah, the learned counselappearing for the writ applicant and Mrs. Kalpana K. Raval, thelearned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue.
3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mrs. Raval,brought to our notice that since the notice under Section 148of the Act, 1961 came to be issued to a dead assessee, thedepartment has thought fit to drop the proceedings.
4.In view of the aforesaid, we need not adjudicate this writapplication any further. This writ application is accordinglydisposed of. Notice discharged. Interim relief, if any, standsvacated.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
NEHA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.