Case LawHigh Court › P.ramachandra Nadar v. The Chief Commiss...

P.ramachandra Nadar v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai Iino

High Court 16 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
P.ramachandra Nadar v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai Iino
Date of order
16 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In P.ramachandra Nadar v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai Iino, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.Nos.18644 & 18645 of 2006 P.Ramachandra Nadar ... Petitioner in both Writ Petitions vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai IINo.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax IVNo.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034. 3.The Tax Recovery Officer XIIBusiness Range IIChennai-600 034. ...Respondents in both Writ Petitions Writ Petition No.18644 of 2006 filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file ofthe first respondent in CC II/B(52)/2002-03 dated 10.03.2006 andquash the impugned order with a direction to the firstrespondent to pass an appropriate order to consider the case onmerits and material facts made available in accordance with thecircular issued by CBDT. Writ Petition No.18645 of 2006 filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file ofthe first respondent in CC II/B(53)/2002-03 dated 10.03.2006 andquash the impugned order with a direction to the firstrespondent to pass an appropriate order to consider the case onmerits and material facts made available in accordance with thecircular issued by CBDT. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Sriraman for Mr.S.SridharFor Respondents : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Naveen Durai Babu Standing Counsel The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also madean endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions aredismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrarmk To 1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai IINo.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax IVNo.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Chennai-600 034.3.The Tax Recovery Officer XIIBusiness Range IIChennai-600 034. +1cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate, S.R.No. 56724.+1cc to Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No. 56508. W.P.Nos.18644 & 18645 2018VGI(CO)rrs 14/09/2018.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan