Case LawHigh Court › Pramukh Enterprises v. The Income Tax Of...

Pramukh Enterprises v. The Income Tax Officer 20(2)(3), Mumbai

High Court 05 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pramukh Enterprises v. The Income Tax Officer 20(2)(3), Mumbai
Date of order
05 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pramukh Enterprises v. The Income Tax Officer 20(2)(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2576 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1097 OF 2011 Pramukh EnterprisesVs. .. Appellant The Income Tax Officer 20(2)(3), Mumbai .. Respondent. Mr.Ajay Singh for the appellant Mr.Abhay Ahuja for the respondent CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 5TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan