In Prashant G. Sharma v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
gopi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.669 OF 2013
Prashant G. Sharma
..Appellant
Vs.
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax & Ors....Respondents
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.670 OF 2013
Prashant G. SharmaVs.
..Appellant
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax & Ors....Respondents
Mr. V.S. Hadade for the appellantMr. P.C. Chhotary for the respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.DATE : 06 September 2013
P.C.
Since the Notice of Motion Nos.857 and 858 of 2013 for condoning the delay of 552 days in filing the appeals have been dismissed, the Income Tax Appeal Lodging Nos.669 and 670 of 2013 do not survive and hence they shall not be given any registration numbers. For statistical purposes the appeals shall be treated as dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue