In Prashant Premchand Bafna… v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The writ petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous. [ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.12.0911:45:03+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6830 OF 2022
Prashant Premchand Bafna… Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
& anr.
…Respondents
*****
Ms.Faiza Shaikh a/w. Mr.Nandu Vishnu Pawar, Advocate forpetitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM :
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
5[th] DECEMBER , 2022.
DATE :
P C :
1.Ms.Faiza Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner statesthat the present petition is rendered infructuous.
2.The writ petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous.
[ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue