Case LawHigh Court › Pratap Singh Rajawat v. Union Of India

Pratap Singh Rajawat v. Union Of India

High Court 10 May 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Pratap Singh Rajawat v. Union Of India
Date of order
10 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pratap Singh Rajawat v. Union Of India, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7852/2010 Pratap Singh Rajawat S/o.Shri Kailash Chandra Rajawat, Agedabout 28 years, R/o. 28, Bheru Nagar, Hatwara Nagar, Jaipur. Versus ----Petitioner 1. Union Of India, through the Secretary to the Govt. of India,Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, New Delhi.2. Director General of Income Tax (Investigation), N.C.R. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), N.C.R. Building, StatueCircle, Jaipur. ----Respondents _____________________________________________________For Appellant(s) : Sh. Neeraj Sharma Adv.For Respondent(s) : Sh. R.B. Mathur Adv. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI 10/05/2017 Order Both the counsel jointly submits that the self same questionwhich has been raised in the instant petition, came to beexamined & decided by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ PetitionNo.5566/2010 (Laxminarain Meena Vs. Union of India & Ors.) &other connected petitions, vide judgment dt.21-7-2015. This Court in the judgment (supra) observed as under :- “Since the question has already been examinedand decided by a Coordinate Division Bench ofthis court, no more lis is res integra to beexamined and keeping in view the order of theDivision Bench referred to we consider itappropriate to dispose of the instant batch of writpetitions accordingly, and all these writpetitioners are entitled to the same relief, mutatismutandis, as granted by the Division Bench in itsjudgment dated 19.3.2015.” In view of the joint statement made by both the counsel, the present writ petition in the light of the terms mutatis mutandis referred to in the judgment (supra), stands disposed of. (DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI),J. (AJAY RASTOGI),J. -Shekhawatvs/C2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan