Case Law › High Court › Pratibha Nagdewani v. Income Tax Office...

Pratibha Nagdewani v. Income Tax Office (Ito

High Court 19 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

19 Aug 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pratibha Nagdewani v. Income Tax Office (Ito, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: The Petition along with pending Application(s) is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5693/2025, CRL.M.A. 24381/2025, CRL.M.A. 24382/2025 PRATIBHA NAGDEWANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajinder Pal Singh and Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocates. Goel, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin, JSC and Ms. Easha JSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 19.08.2025 1. A Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking Quashing of Complaint Case bearing CT No.339/2022 and the Summoning Order dated 30.06.2023 passed by learned ACMM, Central District, Delhi. 2. After some arguments learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to approach the Court of Sessions in accordance with law. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the present Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. The Petition along with pending Application(s) is disposed of accordingly. AUGUST 19, 2025/va NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.