In Pratik Trading Co v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(3, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5369 of 2022
==========================================================
PRATIK TRADING CO
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)(3)
==========================================================Appearance:
MR VIVEKKUMAR CHAVDA(6666) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 28/03/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Vivek Kumar Chavda, the learned advocateappearing for the applicant does not press this applicationand seeks permission to withdraw the same.
Permission as prayed for is granted. This applicationis disposed of as not pressed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
Vahid
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue