Pravin Shantilal Mintrade Pvt.ltd.,Margao Goa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Inv)., Panjim Goa
High Court
31 Jul 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Pravin Shantilal Mintrade Pvt.ltd.,Margao Goa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Inv)., Panjim Goa
Date of order
31 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pravin Shantilal Mintrade Pvt.ltd.,Margao Goa v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Inv)., Panjim Goa, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2006
PRAVIN SHANTILAL MINTRADE PVT.LTD.,MARGAO GOA.
Versus
....Appellant
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(INV)., PANJIM GOA.
....Respondent
Mrs. Amina Phadte, Advocate for the Appellant.Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondent.
P.C.
-Coram:V.C.DAGA &-Date:31st July, 2006
N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
31st July, 2006
On the motion made by learned Counsel on behalf of the appellant, sheis allowed to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to approach the Tribunalfor rectification with no order as to costs.
V.C.DAGA, J.
arp/*
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue